Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal

Develop a 2-4 page policy proposal that seeks to improve the outcomes for your chosen health care issue and target population.


Policy Proposal And Guidelines To Improved Outcomes And Quality Of Geriatric Cancer Patients

The United States’ aging population is quickly increasing, with the majority of older persons suffering from chronic and chronic diseases such as cancer. Because of their age, financial status, and comorbidities, elderly cancer patients are a vulnerable population that frequently faces difficulties getting effective care (Abyad & Hammami, 2021). This policy proposal aims to improve the outcomes for older cancer patients by guaranteeing equal access to treatment, providing comprehensive care that meets their specific requirements, and encouraging early diagnosis and preventive initiatives (Mizutani et al., 2019). A key part of the quality proposal is ensuring fair access to care for older cancer patients. This may be accomplished by deploying telemedicine and mobile health technologies that enable patients to communicate with clinicians remotely. This strategy will assist in alleviating the strain of transportation and mobility concerns on senior patients, boosting access to treatment. Furthermore, there is a need to enhance financing for programs that offer low-income older people affordable care. This can be accomplished by offering tax breaks to healthcare groups that provide low-cost services to elderly cancer patients.

Another aspect of this policy idea is to provide comprehensive care tailored to the specific requirements of older cancer patients. This can be accomplished by forming multidisciplinary care teams comprised of geriatricians, oncologists, social workers, and other healthcare providers. These teams will collaborate to develop individualized care plans for older cancer patients that address their physical, emotional, and social requirements. Palliative care should also be encouraged to treat symptoms and enhance the quality of life (Sourdet et al., 2020). Increasing financing for cancer screening programs, providing educational resources on the significance of early detection, and establishing policies that encourage frequent cancer screenings for older populations can all help to promote early detection and preventive efforts for elderly cancer patients. Early identification and prevention will result in improved treatment results and higher survival rates for older cancer patients.

Advocating The For The Proposed Policy

The aging population in the United States is growing, and with it, so is the prevalence of cancer. Cancer is one of the top causes of mortality in the elderly population; thus, addressing the issue of quality care for this group is critical. Older people may have several comorbidities and need specialist treatment (Miller et al., 2019). Although breakthroughs in treatment, discrepancies in care for the aged population persist, and a recommended policy to address these disparities is required. One of the primary causes of treatment discrepancies is a lack of consistency in geriatric oncology care. A systematic strategy for caring for older cancer patients is required, taking into consideration their individual requirements and comorbidities. This policy proposal seeks to standardize geriatric oncology treatment by creating evidence-based guidelines. The recommendations are created in consultation with geriatric oncology experts, primary care physicians, and other interested parties. The proposals include screening and evaluation, treatment, and supportive care.

Another critical part of the proposed policy is the need for better communication among healthcare practitioners, patients, and carers. Communication is critical in ensuring that patients receive the best treatment possible, especially older cancer patients (Miller et al., 2019). The policy proposal would oblige healthcare practitioners to offer patients and caregivers clear and straightforward information. This information would include the diagnosis, treatment choices, and probable adverse effects. It would also necessitate communication among healthcare practitioners to guarantee that patients receive thorough and coordinated treatment. The proposed regulation will oblige healthcare practitioners to take the patient’s preferences and values into account when making decisions. Older cancer patients frequently have distinct values and goals that must be considered in therapeutic decision-making. This would entail speaking with patients and caregivers about their treatment choices and quality of life (Sourdet et al., 2020). Based on the policy proposal, healthcare practitioners will be required to document these interactions in the patient’s medical record and incorporate them into the treatment plan.

Analysis Of The Potential For An Interprofessional Approach To Implementing A Proposed Policy To Increase The Efficiency Or Effectiveness Of The Care Setting To Achieve High-Quality Outcomes

To ensure the success of the proposed policy, interprofessional teams must collaborate and communicate with one another. An interprofessional approach to policy implementation can improve the care setting’s efficiency and efficacy, resulting in high-quality outcomes for the target population. Effective communication is a crucial interprofessional best practice. Clear and concise communication, active listening, and open feedback are all required for the effectiveness of the policy proposal. Effective communication ensures that all team members understand the purpose, aims, and objectives of the policy (Sourdet et al., 2020). Active listening enables team members to comprehend each other’s viewpoints and detect potential implementation issues. Open feedback fosters a collaborative atmosphere in which healthcare workers may express constructive criticism while also identifying areas for development. Again, interprofessional education is critical because it prepares healthcare workers from many disciplines to work cooperatively in patient care. This technique allows healthcare workers to grasp each other’s roles, responsibilities, and areas of expertise better. Interprofessional education fosters the development of teamwork, communication, and problem-solving abilities, all of which are required for policy implementation. Healthcare workers may establish a practical, effective, and efficient action plan by recognizing the value of collaboration.

Shared decision-making is a collaborative process in which healthcare professionals and patients work together to make decisions about their treatment. This approach acknowledges patient preferences and values and encourages healthcare providers to collaborate with patients to make informed decisions about their care. Collaborative decision-making encourages patient-centered care, which is critical for delivering high-quality results (Sourdet et al., 2020). When healthcare providers include patients in decision-making, they may deliver personalized treatment that is tailored to the patient’s exact requirements.


The proposed policy for enhancing outcomes for older cancer patients through collaborative care has the potential to have a substantial influence on the quality of treatment for this vulnerable group. The interprofessional approach guarantees that all care team members collaborate to offer complete, patient-centered care. The implementation of evidence-based methods, patient education, and communication among team members are critical to the policy’s effectiveness. Implementing the proposed policy necessitates a willingness to adapt and collaborate toward a common objective. High-quality outcomes for the target population can be accomplished by enhancing efficiency and effectiveness in the care setting. Interprofessional best practices, including shared decision-making, clear communication, and collaborative care planning, can result in higher patient satisfaction, fewer hospital readmissions, and better cancer management.


Abyad, A., & Hammami, S. O. (2021). Geriatric medicine in the Arab world. In Handbook of Healthcare in the Arab World (pp. 2149–2176). Springer International Publishing.

Miller, K. D., Nogueira, L., Mariotto, A. B., Rowland, J. H., Yabroff, K. R., Alfano, C. M., Jemal, A., Kramer, J. L., & Siegel, R. L. (2019). Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians69(5), 363–385.

Mizutani, T., Nakamura, K., Fukuda, H., Ogawa, A., Hamaguchi, T., Nagashima, F., & Geriatric Study Committee/Japan Clinical Oncology Group. (2019). Geriatric Research Policy: Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) policy. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology49(10), 901–910.

Sourdet, S., Brechemier, D., Steinmeyer, Z., Gerard, S., & Balardy, L. (2020). Impact of the comprehensive geriatric assessment on treatment decision in geriatric oncology. BMC Cancer20(1), 384.

Get the best nursing paper writers at your own disposal. We have expert writers, researchers available all round to answer your requests. Whether it is an urgent paper or not we are here for you. Message us today for the best deals.